Why Israel Struck Iran: Strategic Rationale Behind Operation Rising Lion
Israel’s Decision Point: Why Now?
After months of escalating proxy violence and the provocative kidnapping and execution of Israeli nationals by Iran-backed militias, Israel launched Operation Rising Lion—a sweeping air and cyber campaign deep into Iranian territory, breaking the long-standing “no direct war” status quo.
According to Israeli defense sources and public statements from Prime Minister [Name Redacted], the rationale was threefold:
1. Iran Was Days Away From a Nuclear Breakout
Recent IAEA reports, confirmed by Mossad and U.S. intelligence, indicated Iran had:
- Enriched uranium beyond 90% purity, crossing the weapons threshold.
- Activated cascade systems in Fordow and Natanz—hardened bunkers immune to most conventional attacks.
- Refused IAEA inspectors full access to facilities since early April.
Israel saw this as a point of no return.
“We will not wait for another Holocaust to act. A nuclear Iran is an existential threat,” said PM [Name].
This is the Begin Doctrine in action—a policy that mandates preemptive strikes on any hostile nation pursuing nuclear weapons (previously applied in Iraq 1981, Syria 2007).
2. Proxies Were Too Close to Home
Iran's proxies were not just harassing Israel’s borders—they were:
- Launching coordinated drone swarms from Gaza and Lebanon
- Attempting cross-border incursions through tunnels
- Targeting Israeli tankers and Red Sea trade routes
The kidnapping of Israeli nationals and drone attacks on hospitals pushed the government past its threshold.
Israeli intelligence believed the attacks were being coordinated by IRGC-Quds Force operatives in Syria, Iraq, and even within Iran. Hitting Iranian soil directly was seen as the only way to dismantle command-and-control structures and shock Iran into strategic recalibration.
3. A Narrow Window—Before It Was Too Late
With the U.S. election season heating up and global focus fragmented, Israel feared:
- Diplomatic stalling would allow Iran to finish its bomb
- International inaction (as seen post-Ukraine invasion) would delay deterrence
- Proxies would grow bold enough to paralyze Israeli civilian life
Sources say Israel gave Washington 72 hours' notice before launching the strike—but made clear:
“We will go alone if we must. Never again means acting before it’s too late.”
Operation Rising Lion: What It Hit
| Target | Location | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| IRGC Air Defense Batteries | Bushehr, Khuzestan | Neutralized early-warning systems |
| Fordow Enrichment Facility | Near Qom | Bunker penetrated with specialized munitions |
| Revolutionary Guard Command HQ | Kermanshah | Destroyed communications grid |
| UAV Assembly Plant | Isfahan | Halted drone manufacturing pipeline |
Global Reaction: Mixed, But Shifting
- U.S.: Initially cautious, then joined with strikes via Operation Midnight Hammer.
- EU & UN: Called for de-escalation but acknowledged Israel’s right to self-defense.
- Russia & China: Condemned the strikes, warning of “Western militarism.”
- Arab States: Split—Gulf nations quietly supported action against Iran’s nuclear threat; Iraq and Syria condemned it.
Conclusion: The Strategic Gamble
Israel knew the risks: direct war with Iran, possible Hezbollah retaliation, global outrage. But the alternative—an emboldened, nuclear-armed Iran—was seen as existentially unacceptable.
As one Israeli general put it:
“If you wait until the enemy loads the bullet, you’ve already lost.”
Similar Posts : The Risks and Limits of Iran’s Proxy Strategy: When It Backfires, Iran’s Proxy Playbook: How Tehran Wages War Without Direct Conflict, Why the U.S. Joined: Inside Operation Midnight Hammer, Why Do Some People or Groups Support Terror-Linked Countries like Iran and Pakistan, Why Iran Chose Proxies Over a Nuclear Deterrent - Until Now, See Also:Iran israel hamas houthies Hezbollah tripleH