Misuse of Article365 by Congress

Article 365 of the Indian Constitution plays a critical role in the governance of the country, particularly in maintaining the balance between state and central powers. However, its application has been subject to controversy, especially regarding its alleged misuse by the Congress government. This article delves into the intricacies of Article 365, its intended purpose, benefits, limitations, and instances of its misuse.

Article 365 states that if a state government fails to comply with or give effect to directions from the Union government, it can be deemed that the government of the state cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution. This can trigger President's Rule under Article 356, allowing the central government to take direct control of the state.

The framers of the Indian Constitution included Article 365 to ensure that state governments adhere to the laws and policies set by the central government. This provision aimed to maintain the unity and integrity of India, especially in the early years post-independence when the stability of the nascent republic was a priority.

When a state government is seen to be violating constitutional provisions or disregarding central directives, the President, upon receiving a report from the Governor or otherwise, can declare that the state government is not functioning as per the Constitution. This declaration can lead to the imposition of President's Rule under Article 356, effectively suspending the state government and transferring executive authority to the President, administered through the Governor.

1. Constitutional Compliance: Ensures that state governments operate within the framework of the Constitution.
2. National Integrity: Helps maintain a uniform legal and administrative system across the country.
3. Crisis Management: Provides a mechanism to address severe governance issues or constitutional breakdowns in states.

1. Political Misuse: Article 365 can be exploited by the central government to dismiss state governments led by opposition parties, undermining democratic principles.
2. Federalism Undermined: Frequent use of this provision can weaken the federal structure, reducing state autonomy.
3. Judicial Review: While the judiciary can review the imposition of President's Rule, the process can be lengthy and politically charged.

1. Karnataka (1989): The Congress government dismissed the state government, citing failure to adhere to central directives. Critics argued this move was politically motivated to weaken opposition strength.

2. Andhra Pradesh (1989): Similar to Karnataka, the dismissal of the state government was viewed as an attempt to consolidate political power rather than address a genuine constitutional crisis.

- These dismissals often coincided with crucial political events, such as elections, indicating a strategic use of Article 365 to destabilize opposition governments.

1. Legitimate Triggers: Article 365 should only be invoked in genuine cases of constitutional breakdown, not for political gains.
2. Judicial Safeguards: Strengthen judicial review processes to ensure fair assessment of President's Rule impositions.
3. Clear Guidelines: Establish transparent criteria for invoking Article 365 to prevent arbitrary use.

 

Article 365 is a powerful tool designed to maintain constitutional governance in India. However, its misuse for political purposes undermines federal principles and democratic values. A balanced approach, with robust safeguards and clear guidelines, is essential to ensure it serves its intended purpose without compromising state autonomy.

- Constituent Assembly Debates
- Reports on the imposition of President's Rule
- Scholarly articles on federalism and constitutional law in India